Skip to main content
Palgrave Macmillan

The Politics of Freedom of Expression

The Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States

  • Book
  • © 2013

Overview

  • A unique systematic analysis of US Supreme Court decisions
  • Of wide interest to scholars of politics and law
  • Part of Palgrave Macmillan's SocioLegal Studies series

Part of the book series: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies (PSLS)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (7 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

The principle of content-neutrality is the cornerstone of freedom of expression jurisprudence, protecting the core values of freedom of speech set out in the first amendment, whilst also enabling the government to place reasonable restrictions on protected speech.

The Politics of Freedom of Expression examines the US Supreme Court's decision-making in freedom of expression cases, from the Earl Warren Court in 1953 to the 2012 decisions of the John Roberts Court, assessing the extent to which the justices take into consideration their own political attitudes, jurisprudence and external factors such as federal government participation. In doing so, the book highlights the role of the civil rights movement in developing the content-neutrality jurisprudential regime.

Establishing 'jurisprudential regime theory' as a framework for incorporating the various factors that can affect decision-making, the author draws on quantitative, qualitative and interpretive methods in order to analyse the justices' changing treatment of content-based and content-neutral cases over time. This unique theoretical approach allows the text to push beyond the traditional 'law versus politics' debate in order to critically evaluate the importance of content-neutrality to the Supreme Court's decision-making, and to compare decision-making in the US with Canada, Germany, Japan and the UK.

Reviews

In this book Mark Richards addresses the debate about the role of legal considerations in the Supreme Court's decisions and presents a close examination of the Court's decisions on freedom of expression. His thoughtful and insightful analyses make important contributions to our understanding of both these subjects and the connections between them.' - Lawrence Baum, Emeritus Professor of Political Science, Ohio State University, USA.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Department of Political Science, Grand Valley State University, USA

    Mark J Richards

About the author

Mark J Richards is Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at Grand Valley State University, Michigan, USA.

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: The Politics of Freedom of Expression

  • Book Subtitle: The Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States

  • Authors: Mark J Richards

  • Series Title: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277589

  • Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan London

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences Collection, Social Sciences (R0)

  • Copyright Information: Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-137-27757-2Published: 06 August 2013

  • eBook ISBN: 978-1-137-27758-9Published: 06 August 2013

  • Series ISSN: 2947-9274

  • Series E-ISSN: 2947-9282

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XIV, 220

  • Topics: Human Rights

Publish with us