Skip to main content
Palgrave Macmillan

Free Speech and the State

An Unprincipled Approach

  • Book
  • © 2017

Overview

  • Uses a Hobbesian absolutist position to reconsider existing arguments surrounding rights to free speech
  • Argues that the limits of free speech should be set by the state through a process of social and political contestation
  • Highlights how any analysis of free speech requires nuanced arguments depending on specific place and circumstance

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (4 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book addresses the question: “What should be the appropriate limits to free speech?” The author claims that it is the state, rather than abstract principles, that must provide the answer. The book defends a version of Hobbesian absolutism and rejects the dominant liberal idea that there is a right (human or civil) setting the boundaries of free speech. This liberal view can be known as the “principled defence of free speech”, in which speech is established as a constitutional principle that has priority over the state. The author instead offers an “unprincipled approach to free speech”, suggesting that the boundaries of speech must necessarily be set by the state, which in liberal democracies means through social and political contestation. The final chapter applies the argument to the topic of hate speech and argues that it is appropriate to limit such speech when it causes harm and offense. The book will be of use to students and scholars across political theory, political science, sociology, philosophy and law. 

Authors and Affiliations

  • University of Western Australia , Nedlands, Australia

    David van Mill

About the author

David van Mill is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at the University of Western Australia. 

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us