9780230506855
 
   Enlarge Image
 
 
The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy
 
 
Palgrave Macmillan
 
 
 
28 Nov 2006
|
£55.00
|
Hardback
 In Stock
 
9780230506855
|| 
 
 
23 Jul 2009
|
£19.99
|
Paperback
 In Stock
 
9780230230514
|| 

DescriptionReviewsContentsAuthors terte

Description

In the early twentieth century a philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell concerning a range of connected issues of apparently technical significance: the nature and unity of the proposition, the proper account of truth, and the status of relations. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the philosophical movement known as British Idealism, and its eventual replacement by the various forms of analytic philosophy. Since then, a conception of this debate and its rights and wrongs has become entrenched in English-language philosophy. Stewart Candlish examines afresh not only the events of this formative period in twentieth-century thought but also the standard conception of them, providing a reassessment of Bradley's contribution to modern philosophy, new insight into the development of Russell's thought, and some surprising conclusions.


Reviews





'What Candlish achieves is not only a detailed exploration of the philosophical dispute between Russell and Bradley (that is, between Analytical Philosophy and its immediate ancestor), but also an explanation of why that dispute is philosophically and historically significant. As such it is not only revealing about why Russell attached great importance to Bradley's criticisms; it is also compelling as a case for why those of us continuing to pursue the Russellian project have much to learn from revisiting the dispute.' - Graham Stevens, Department of Philosophy, University of Manchester

'Stewart Candlish's elegant, iconoclastic study of the Bradley/Russell dispute puts the arguments, the stakes, and the outcome into an entirely new perspective. It should be required reading for anyone even tempted by a Whiggish interpretation of the history of recent philosophy.' - James W. Allard, Department of History and Philosophy, Montana State University

'This excellent analysis of the dispute between Russell and Bradley makes a substantial contribution to our understanding of the origins of twentieth-century philosophy. Anchored in a detailed knowledge of the texts it advances beyond more simplistic versions of their disagreement to offer new and important analyses of the points at issue between these two great philosophers. It is a book that all subsequent scholars will need to take account of. The writing is as clear and precise as it is fluid and engaging.' - William Mander, Harris Manchester College, Oxford University

'Candlish offers an important contribution to the debate over British idealism and the origins of Analytic Philosophy, the clarity of which shows the benefits of teaching his material - a benefit which, he concedes, Bradley's obscure writings did not receive.' - Andy Hamilton, Durham University

'Stewart Candlish's book…is to be warmly welcomed for its careful and instructive analyses…Throughout the book, Candlish does a superb job in distinguishing what needs to be distinguished, in clarifying the philosophical problems, in charting the development of the relevant views of both Russell and Bradley, and in sorting out the confusions and misunderstandings on both sides.' – Michael Beaney, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies
 
'This is a rich book...it is at once a valuable contribution to our understanding of the dispute between Russell and Bradley and to our understanding of the philosophical subject matter of that dispute.' - Jeff Speaks, Australian Journal of Philosophy
 
'Candlish's careful and insightful reexamination of a crucial episode in the early history of analytic philosophy is a very important addition to the existing literature on Bradley, Russell, and our recent past...It is highly recommended to anyone even slightly tempted by the idea that philosophy should leave its history behind.' - Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie

'[a] thoughtful, careful, and gracefully written book.' - James Levine, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews


Contents

Preface
The Stereotypical Picture of the Russell/Bradley Dispute
Finding a Way into Bradley's Metaphysics
Judgment
Truth
Grammar and Ontology
Relations
Decline and Fall
Bibliography
Index


Authors

STEWART CANDLISH is Professorial Fellow in Philosophy at The University of Western Australia and Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities.


terte





terte






Palgrave Macmillan Ltd
home Palgrave Macmillan Ltd
whitebar
Related Titles