Skip to main content
Palgrave Macmillan
Book cover

Polarity, Balance of Power and International Relations Theory

Post-Cold War and the 19th Century Compared

  • Book
  • © 2017

Overview

  • Provides inventory of different polarity definitions and their application to the 19th century and the post-Cold War era

  • Offers an analysis of the French multipolar discourse and its comparison with the American (non)-use of polarity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (9 chapters)

  1. Polarity, Neorealism and its Problems

  2. Polarity in the Cold War, the 19th Century and Today

  3. Nineteenth-Century Balance of Power and Twenty-First-Century Multipolarity

  4. Conclusions

Keywords

About this book

This book discusses the rise of polarity as a key concept in International Relations Theory. Since the end of the Cold War, until at least the end of 2010, there has been a wide consensus shared by American academics, political commentators and policy makers: the world was unipolar and would remain so for some time. By contrast, outside the US, a multipolar interpretation prevailed. This volume explores this contradiction and questions the Neorealist claim that polarity is the central structuring element of the international system. Here, the author analyses different historic eras through a polarity lens, compares the way polarity is used in the French and US public discourses, and through careful examination, reaches the conclusion that polarity terminology as a theoretical concept is highly influenced by the Cold War context in which it emerged. This volume is an important resource for students and researchers with a critical approach to Neorealism, and to those interested in the defining shifts the world went through during the last twenty five years.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Department of Political Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Goedele De Keersmaeker

About the author

Goedele De Keersmaeker is a researcher at the Ghent Institute of International Studies (GIIS). She is a former director of the International Peace Information Service (Antwerp) and of the Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly (Prague). Goedele has a vast experience of educational writing on international relations and security, with particular research interests in a historical approach to international relations. 

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us