Authors:
- Explores the role of the main media outlets in Britain in shaping public opinion on the EU over two decades
- Debunks some of the myths presented in the British press from an EU insider's perspective
- Highlights the importance of a truthful and responsible press for democracy
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (8 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Conclusion
-
Front Matter
-
-
Back Matter
About this book
This book traces how right-wing newspapers in Britain helped shape British public opinion about the European Union over the course of the 20 years preceding the EU referendum in June 2016. The author argues that newspapers such as the Telegraph, Mail, Sun and Express have been effectively waging a long-term propaganda war, with the distortions and borderline fake news presented one of the factors that helped secure the narrow majority for Brexit. Written by an EU insider, the book presents hard facts and debunks the core myths on EU laws, exorbitant budget contributions and uncontrolled immigration, and contributes to the broader debate on the importance of the press for democracy.
Keywords
- Brexit
- European Union
- British press
- referendum
- democracy
- national sovereignity
- international cooperation
- Maastricht
- euroscepticism
- referendum campaign
- propaganda
- immigration
- migrant crisis
- press freedom
- Leave campaign
- Remain campaign
- UK EU relationship
- taking back control
- EU membership
- populism
- european union politics
Reviews
“Fake news and disinformation distorting public opinion from real, checked facts is one of the biggest threats facing today’s democracies. In this must-read book, Rawlinson lucidly describes how emotions — sometimes unrelated to the real subject matter of the vote — gained the upper hand and brought an entire nation to a decision potentially harming its own interests.” (Enrico D'Ambrogio, Policy Analyst, EPRS – European Parliamentary Research Service)
“This book makes and important argument, not about the way in which the UK public was misled during the EU referendum, but about the way they had been served distortion for decades. What had been condoned as irrelevant tabloid cheekiness helped re-frame the real world. Clear, cool and well researched it is a sorry tale.” (Jean Seaton, Professor of Media History, University of Westminster, UK, and Official Historian of the BBC)
“This timely book revisits the major controversies over sovereignty, immigration and related issues that helped Leave win in 2016. Written by a former European Commission official, it offers a passionate yet informative critique of the case made for Brexit by many British newspapers. The book also provides valuable insights into how these papers developed and articulated their Eurosceptic message over the decades prior to the referendum.” (Dominic Wring, Professor of Political Communication, Loughborough University, UK)
Authors and Affiliations
-
Ottignies, Belgium
Francis Rawlinson
About the author
Francis Rawlinson is a former EU Commission official. He is also Fellow of Kwansei Gakuin University, where he was a professor for EU studies from 2011 to 2017. He has written on EU competition law, state aid control, the euro and regional development.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: How Press Propaganda Paved the Way to Brexit
Authors: Francis Rawlinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27765-9
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan Cham
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media Studies, Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)
Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-030-27764-2Published: 05 February 2020
eBook ISBN: 978-3-030-27765-9Published: 21 January 2020
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XXI, 342
Number of Illustrations: 2 b/w illustrations, 1 illustrations in colour
Topics: Journalism, Popular Science in Political Science and International Relations, Political Communication, European Union Politics, Electoral Politics, Democracy