Authors:
- Performs a bicameral analysis of court curbing and court structuring legislation over time
- Examines court curbing and court structuring legislation from the perspective of the judiciary committees
- Analyzes administrative court curbing, which describes when Congress prevents judicial review over executive or administrative actions
- Provides an account of separation of powers motivations behind judicial review and justiciability
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (5 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary.
Keywords
- judicial politics
- judiciary committee
- US Congress
- House of Representatives
- US Senate
- court curbing
- bicameral analysis
- court structuring
- Justiciability
- legislation
- judicial oversight
- Supreme Court
- judicial review
- Article III
- US Constitution
- appellate jurisdiction
- judicial expansion
- law and courts
- judgeships
- separation of powers
Reviews
“This book provides a novel description of conflict between the Congress and the US Supreme Court. Tecklenburg’s perspective on legislative constraints on the judiciary breathes fresh air into an important and timely topic. At a time when high-stakes conflict among our national institutions is politically and socially salient, this book will be essential reading.”
—Tom Clark, Charles Howard Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, USA
Authors and Affiliations
-
Department of Political Science and International Studies, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, USA
H. Chris Tecklenburg
About the author
H. Chris Tecklenburg is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science and International Studies department at Georgia Southern University, USA. He received his B.A. and J.D. from the University of South Carolina, and his Ph.D. from the University of Florida. His current research interests include Constitutional Law issues, including separation of powers.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses
Book Subtitle: Examining Judiciary Committee Court Curbing and Court Structuring Bills
Authors: H. Chris Tecklenburg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44379-5
Publisher: Palgrave Pivot Cham
eBook Packages: Political Science and International Studies, Political Science and International Studies (R0)
Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-030-38083-0Published: 22 April 2020
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-030-44405-1Published: 23 April 2021
eBook ISBN: 978-3-030-44379-5Published: 21 April 2020
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XII, 120
Number of Illustrations: 1 b/w illustrations, 3 illustrations in colour
Topics: US Politics, Legislative and Executive Politics, Public Law, Governance and Government