Shakespeare and Conceptual Blending

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-xxii

   PDF

2. Introduction

   • Michael Booth

   Pages 1-14

3. Shakespeare’s Stories

   • Michael Booth

   Pages 15-69

4. Shakespeare’s Wit

   • Michael Booth

   Pages 71-113

5. Shakespeare’s Poetry

   • Michael Booth

   Pages 115-225

6. Criticism and the Blending Mind

   • Michael Booth

   Pages 227-247

7. Back Matter

   Pages 249-257

   PDF

This book shows how Shakespeare’s excellence as storyteller, wit and poet reflects the creative process of conceptual blending. Cognitive theory provides a wealth of new ideas that illuminate Shakespeare, even as he illuminates them, and the theory of blending, or conceptual integration, strikingly corroborates and amplifies both classic and current insights of literary criticism. This study explores how Shakespeare crafted his plots by fusing diverse story elements and compressing incidents to strengthen dramatic illusion; considers Shakespeare’s wit as involving sudden incongruities and a reckoning among differing points of view; interrogates how blending generates the “strange meaning” that distinguishes poetic expression; and situates the project in relation to other cognitive literary criticism. This book is of particular significance to scholars and students of Shakespeare and cognitive theory, as well as readers curious about how the mind works.

• Mind
• Narrative
• Integration
• Brain
• Neuroplay

“This book is a major breakthrough in combining literary theory with cognitive and cognitive-linguistic theories, which Booth uses to illuminate both Shakespeare's genius and our enjoyment of his works. The book will excite literary and cognitive scholars alike.” (Professor Eve Sweetser, University of California, Berkeley, USA)

• Cambridge, USA

  Michael Booth

Michael Booth has taught English Literature at Oberlin College, USA and held both teaching and administrative positions at Harvard University, USA.  He has been awarded a Mellon postdoctoral fellowship and a John Carter Brown Library research fellowship, and has published articles in Early Modern Culture and The Yale Journal of Criticism.

Policies and ethics