Skip to main content
Palgrave Macmillan

West Papuan Decolonisation

Contesting Histories

  • Book
  • © 2021

Overview

  • Provides a legal, historical and political context to West Papuan political claims in the early 2000s

  • Includes an innovative paradigm combining Settler Colonial Studies and Critical Indigenous Theory

  • Demonstrates attributes of competing narratives that all point to the typical attributes of narratives in a settler colonial historical contestation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (6 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

In alignment with Indigenous Politics, an emerging sub-field of Politics and IR, this book  considers West Papuan Indigenous nationhood. Combining Settler Colonial Studies and Critical Indigenous Theory, the research opens up sovereignty as a political category of analysis to reveal an embedded nation within Indonesia.

In June 2000 the Second Papuan People’s Congress in Jayapura rejected the basis on which West Papua had been incorporated into Indonesia and resolved that the “people of Papua have been sovereign as a nation and a state since 1 December 1962”. Indonesian president Wahid firmly opposed this resolution and state officials posted historical narratives on the Australian Embassy website that legitimated Indonesia’s incorporation of the once non-self-governing territory.

A mapping and analysis of these narratives demonstrate a settler colonial present within Southeast Asia. It is argued that the US’s appeasement of Indonesia’s takeover in the 1960s was based on the Great Power’s concern to promote its strategic and economic status in the region.

“This is a timely intervention that contributes to a growing debate on settler colonialism as a mode of domination that characterises the global present and involves locales not normally seen as settler colonial. West Papua fits the bill”.

-Associate Professor Lorenzo Veracini, author of Settler Colonial Studies: A Theoretical overview.




Reviews

“This is a timely intervention that contributes to a growing debate on settler colonialism as a mode of domination that characterises the global present and involves locales not normally seen as settler colonial. West Papua fits the bill”. (--Associate Professor Lorenzo Veracini, author of Settler Colonial Studies: A Theoretical overview.)

“While the facts of West Papua’s political history remain unchallenged, the narratives provided by four separate actors— the United States, international legal scholars, Indonesia, and West Papua—provide strikingly different representations of those facts. Hanrahan addresses each narrative separately, using a combination of Settler Colonial Studies and Critical Indigenous Theory to frame each narrative and understand the underlying intent of each actor. In doing so, Hanrahan reveals an important but seemingly ignored truth: West Papua was denied a proper decolonization process and as a result, remains a colonial state.” (--Calia Anderson, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP), Volume 54, Number 1 – Fall 2021)

Authors and Affiliations

  • Independent Scholar, Melbourne, Australia

    Eileen Hanrahan

About the author

Dr Eileen Hanrahan is an independent scholar.  

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us